A multi‐objective second‐order optimal design for deforming networks

19Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To determine displacement and strain fields accurately and reliably, we need to specify several quality arguments to design deforming networks optimally. The purpose of this study is to investigate optimal design problems of deforming networks from the viewpoint of multi‐objective optimal theory. Based on accuracy, reliability and the character of a deformation model, a multi‐objective optimal technique has been developed for designing a 3‐D deforming network. It simultaneously takes into account optimal designs of displacement vectors and principal strain components. A criterion matrix for the principal components of strain is constructed. Numerical results are discussed in terms of objective function values, error ellipsoids of displacement vectors and principal components of strain. Copyright © 1995, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

References Powered by Scopus

Unbiased free net adjustment

51Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Three-dimensional deformation analysis: Global vector spherical harmonic and local finite element representation

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Earthquakes and sea level: Space and terrestrial metrology on a changing planet

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Applications of linear and nonlinear models: Fixed effects, random effects, and total least squares

64Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A hybrid global optimization method: The one-dimensional case

46Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

First-order design of geodetic networks using the simulated annealing method

43Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xu, P., & Grafarend, E. (1995). A multi‐objective second‐order optimal design for deforming networks. Geophysical Journal International, 120(3), 577–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1995.tb01840.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

63%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

13%

Researcher 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 8

67%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 4

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free