Frequency of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Chronic Non-Specific Diarrhea

  • Ghoshal U
  • Kumar S
  • Mehrotra M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) occurs in varying frequency in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We studied the frequency of SIBO in IBS and chronic non-specific diarrhea (CNSD).METHODS: 129 patients with IBS (Manning's criteria), 73 with CNSD (>/= 4 weeks diarrhea with two of these tests normal [urine D-xylose, fecal fat and duodenal biopsy]) and 51 healthy controls (HC) were evaluated for SIBO using glucose hydrogen breath test (GHBT). Diarrhea-predominant IBS (D-IBS) was grouped into CNSD. Rise in breath hydrogen 12 ppm above basal following 100 g glucose was diagnostic of SIBO.RESULTS: Of 129 patients with IBS, 7 were constipation (C-IBS), and 122 were of indeterminate type (I-IBS). Patients with IBS were younger than HC and CNSD (IBS vs. HC: 36.6 yr +/- 11.4 vs. 44.1 yr +/- 13.6, p = 0.001; IBS vs. CNSD: 36.6 yr +/- 11.4 vs. 42 yr +/- 14.5, p = 0.003). Patients with CNSD were comparable to HC in age (42 yr +/- 14.5 vs. 44.1 yr +/- 13.6, p = ns). Patients with IBS were more often male than HC [108/129 (83.7%) vs. 34/51 (66.7%) p = 0.02]; gender of CNSD and HC was comparable [male 39/73 (53.4%) vs. 34/51 (66.7%) p = ns]. SIBO was commoner in CNSD than HC [16 (21.9%) vs. 1 (2%), p = 0.003], but was comparable in IBS and HC [11 (8.5%) vs. 1 (2%), p = 0.18]. Patients with CNSD more often had SIBO than IBS [16 (21.9%) vs. 11 (8.5%), p = 0.007].CONCLUSIONS: SIBO was more common in CNSD including D-IBS than other types of IBS and HC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ghoshal, U. C., Kumar, S., Mehrotra, M., Lakshmi, C., & Misra, A. (2010). Frequency of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Chronic Non-Specific Diarrhea. Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, 16(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm.2010.16.1.40

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free