Predictors of discordance in the assessment of skeletal muscle mass between computed tomography and bioimpedance analysis

10Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) and bioimpedance analysis (BIA) can assess skeletal muscle mass (SMM). Our objective was to identify the predictors of discordance between CT and BIA in assessing SMM. Participants who received a comprehensive medical health check-up between 2010 and 2018 were recruited. The CT and BIA-based diagnostic criteria for low SMM are as follows: Defined CT cutoff values (lumbar skeletal muscle index (LSMI) <1 standard deviation (SD) and means of 46.12 cm2/m2 for men and 34.18 cm2/m2 for women) and defined BIA cutoff values (appendicular skeletal muscle/height2 <7.0 kg/m2 for men and <5.7 kg/m2 for women). A total of 1163 subjects were selected. The crude and body mass index (BMI)-adjusted SMM assessed by CT were significantly associated with those assessed by BIA (correlation coefficient = 0.78 and 0.68, respectively; p < 0.001). The prevalence of low SMM was 15.1% by CT and 16.4% by BIA. Low SMM diagnosed by CT was significantly associated with advanced age, female gender, and lower serum albumin level, whereas low SMM diagnosed by BIA was significantly associated with advanced age, female gender, and lower BMI (all p < 0.05). Upon multivariate analysis, age >65 years, female and BMI <25 kg/m2 had significantly higher risks of discordance than their counterparts (all p < 0.05). We found a significant association between SMM assessed by CT and BIA. SMM assessment using CT and BIA should be interpreted cautiously in older adults (>65 years of age), female and BMI <25 kg/m2. View Full-Text.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jo, M. H., Lim, T. S., Jeon, M. Y., Lee, H. W., Kim, B. K., Park, J. Y., … Kim, S. U. (2019). Predictors of discordance in the assessment of skeletal muscle mass between computed tomography and bioimpedance analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8030322

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free