Production and Stabilization of Real-Time Task Schedules

51Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A model for multiprocessor control is considered in which jobs are broken into various pieces, called tasks. Tasks are executed by single processing units. In this paper the structure controlling the assignment of tasks to processors is the task list, which orders all tasks according to servicing priority. When a processors becomes free, it simply picks up the highest priority task that is executable at that moment. The job and its component tasks are imagined to be interacting with an environment consisting of a set of rigid timing constraints. Such constraints are of two types, called start-times and deadlines. The interaction is specified by requiring that certain distinguished tasks conform directly to one or more of these constraints. Tasks conforming to a start-time cannot begin until the start-time has passed, and tasks conforming to a deadline cannot proceed beyond the deadline. In our model, all tasks have known maximum run-times, but in any particular job execution, task run-times are unknown. It is shown that despite the simplicity of this control scheme some peculiar phenomena result. Most of these phenomena were first noticed by P. Richards in 1960. A simulation study (Appendix I) reveals that they may be very common in practice. In the present paper and a companion paper by R. L. Graham [Bell Syst. Tech. J. 45 (1966), 1563-1581] a coherent theory of task-list control is developed, in which the nature of these peculiarities is brought under systematic study. A number of potentially useful results are derived. © 1967, ACM. All rights reserved.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Manacher, G. K. (1967). Production and Stabilization of Real-Time Task Schedules. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 14(3), 439–465. https://doi.org/10.1145/321406.321408

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘15‘17‘18‘19‘20‘2302468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

71%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

12%

Researcher 2

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 13

76%

Engineering 2

12%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

6%

Psychology 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0