Poor muscle strength and function in physically inactive childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus despite very mild disease

6Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To compare muscle strength (i.e. lower- and upper-body strength) and function between physically inactive childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus patients (C-SLE) and healthy controls (CTRL). Methods: This was a cross-sectional study and the sample consisted of 19 C-SLE (age between 9 to 18 years) and 15 CTRL matched by age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and physical activity levels (assessed by accelerometry). Lower- and upper-body strength was assess by the one-repetition-maximum (1-RM) test. Isometric strength was assessed through a handgrip dynamometer. Muscle function was evaluated by the timed-stands test (TST) and the timed-up-and-go test (TUG). Results: When compared with CTRL, C-SLE showed lower leg-press and bench-press 1-RM (p = 0.026 and p = 0.008, respectively), and a tendency towards lower handgrip strength (p = 0.052). C-SLE showed lower TST scores (p = 0.036) and a tendency towards higher TUG scores (p = 0.070) when compared with CTRL. Conclusion: Physically inactive C-SLE patients with very mild disease showed reduced mus- cle strength and functionality when compared with healthy controls matched by physical activity levels. These findings suggest C-SLE patients may greatly suffer from a physically inactive lifestyle than healthy controls do. Moreover, some sub-clinical "residual" effect of the disease or its pharmacological treatment seems to affect C-SLE patients even with a well-controlled disease.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pinto, A. J., Benatti, F. B., Roschel, H., Pinto, A. L. de S., Silva, C. A., Sallum, A. M. E., & Gualano, B. (2016). Poor muscle strength and function in physically inactive childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus despite very mild disease. Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia, 56(6), 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbre.2016.07.012

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free