How Partisan Is Local Law Enforcement? Evidence from Sheriff Cooperation with Immigration Authorities

5Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Is local law enforcement conducted differently based on the party in power? I offer an answer to this question by focusing on a case in which law enforcement is elected and has meaningful independent discretion: sheriff compliance with federal requests to detain unauthorized immigrants. Using a regression discontinuity design in a new dataset of over 3,200 partisan sheriff elections and administrative data on sheriff behavior, I find that Democrats and Republicans comply at nearly the same rate. These results contribute to ongoing research into the role that partisanship plays in local policy making, indicating that law enforcement officers make similar choices across party lines even when they have broad authority. I also present evidence that sheriffs hold more similar immigration enforcement views across party than the general public, highlighting the role of candidate entry and selection in determining the level of partisan polarization.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thompson, D. M. (2020). How Partisan Is Local Law Enforcement? Evidence from Sheriff Cooperation with Immigration Authorities. American Political Science Review, 114(1), 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000613

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free