Robotic versus open Ivor–Lewis esophagectomy: A more accurate lymph node dissection without burdening the leak rate

8Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) combines the beneficial effects of minimally invasive surgery on postoperative complications, especially on pulmonary ones, with the safety of the anastomosis performed in open surgery. Moreover, RAMIE could allow a more accurate lymphadenectomy. Methods: We reviewed our database to identify all patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus treated by Ivor–Lewis esophagectomy in the period January 2014 to June 2022. Patients were divided according to the thoracic approach into RAMIE and open esophagectomy (OE) groups. We compared the groups for early surgical outcomes, 90-day mortality as well as R0 rate, and the number of lymph nodes harvested. Results: We identified 47 patients in RAMIE and 159 patients in the OE group. Baseline characteristics were comparable. Operative time was significantly longer for RAMIE procedures (p < 0.01); however, we did not observe the difference in overall (RAMIE 55.5% vs. OE 61%, p = 0.76) and severe complications rate (RAMIE 17% vs. OE 22.6%, p = 0.4). The anastomotic leak rate was 2.1% after RAMIE and 6.9% after OE (p = 0.56). We did not report the difference in 90-day mortality (RAMIE 2.1% vs. OE 1.9%, p = 0.65). In the RAMIE group, we observed a significantly higher number of thoracic lymph nodes harvested, with a median of 10 lymph nodes in the RAMIE group versus 8 in the OE group (p < 0.01). Conclusions: In our experience, RAMIE has morbimortality rates comparable to OE. Moreover, it allows a more accurate thoracic lymphadenectomy which results in a higher thoracic lymph nodes retrieval rate.

References Powered by Scopus

The clavien-dindo classification of surgical complications: Five-year experience

9064Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

International consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG)

891Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer, 11th Edition: part I

0
726Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Surgical outcomes of 500 robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomies for esophageal carcinoma

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fully robotic side-to-side stapled anastomosis provides less anastomotic leakage than conventional minimally invasive approach in Ivor Lewis esophagectomy

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Colonic interposition in esophagectomy: an ACS-NSQIP study

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weindelmayer, J., De Pasqual, C. A., Turolo, C., Gervasi, M. C., Sacco, M., Bencivenga, M., & Giacopuzzi, S. (2023). Robotic versus open Ivor–Lewis esophagectomy: A more accurate lymph node dissection without burdening the leak rate. Journal of Surgical Oncology, 127(7), 1109–1115. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27246

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 2

100%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free