From charlottesville to the nobel: Political leaders and the morality of political honors*

8Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Political honors are ubiquitous in public life, whether in the form of public monuments, street names, or national holidays. Yet such honors have received scant attention from normative political theorists. Tackling this gap, I begin by criticizing a desert-based approach to political honors. I then argue that morally appropriate honors are best understood as marking and reinforcing the moral commitments of the collective in whose name they are being awarded. I show how this thesis clarifies and organizes core intuitions regarding a variety of honors, from those commemorating slave-owning founders of the United States to the Nobel Peace Prize.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Political vandalism as counter-speech: A defense of defacing and destroying tainted monuments

49Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How Statues Speak

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Objectionable Commemorations: Ethical and Political Issues

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nili, S. (2020, April 1). From charlottesville to the nobel: Political leaders and the morality of political honors*. Ethics. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/707215

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘23‘2400.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Philosophy 2

67%

Social Sciences 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0