Quantitative assessment of fluorescence intensity of ICG in sentinel nodes in early gastric cancer

23Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The sentinel node (SN) detection by dual tracer method using indocyanine green (ICG) and a radioisotope (RI) has been recommended for early gastric cancer. However, institutions are limited due to radioactivity in the RI method. The greatest advantage of the RI method is that it objectively assesses RI uptake as a numerical value. The aim of the present study was to verify the usefulness of ICG fluorescence intensity in SN. Methods: Seventeen patients with early gastric cancer were enrolled in this study. RI uptake by each lymph node was measured using Navigator GPS and fluorescence nodes were identified using the hyper eye medical system (HEMS). Fluorescence intensity in fluorescence nodes was evaluated using ICG intensity imaging software (Mizuho, Japan) of the HEMS. Results: The total number of dissected lymph nodes was 227, with an average of 13.3 per patient. The numbers of HN, FN-S, and FN-B were 64, 77, and 34. RI uptake was significantly greater by FN-S than by non-FN-S (P = 0.0016). The median fluorescence intensity value was higher in HN than in non-HN (P < 0.001). A correlation was observed between RI uptake and fluorescence intensity. Dissecting FNs with fluorescence intensity levels of 1–6 resulted in 92.1% dissection of HNs. Conclusion: It is possible that the evaluation of fluorescence intensity is useful for selected SNs instead of RI tracer. If fluorescence intensity is measurable in surgery, an infrared fluorescence method using ICG may be useful and safe for the detection of SN in early gastric cancer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Okubo, K., Uenosono, Y., Arigami, T., Matsushita, D., Yanagita, S., Kijima, T., … Natsugoe, S. (2018). Quantitative assessment of fluorescence intensity of ICG in sentinel nodes in early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer, 21(5), 776–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-018-0816-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free