Outcomes of Nissen fundoplication in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and delayed gastric emptying

29Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) on subjective and objective outcomes of gastroesophageal reflux disease following Nissen fundoplication with or without pyloroplasty. Design: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Setting: Tertiary care teaching hospital. Patients: A total of 141 consecutive patients considered for Nissen fundoplication who also had suspected DGE based on symptoms. Interventions: Of 141 patients, 63 had a time to 50% emptying (T1/2) greater than 90 minutes; 47 of the 63 of these had severe DGE (T1/2>150 minutes) and had Nissen fundoplication and pyloroplasty. Sixteen of the 141 with T1/2 greater than 90 but less than 150 minutes and 78 with normal gastric emptying findings (n=78) had Nissen fundoplication only. Main Outcome Measures: Postoperatively, patients with symptom scores greater than 2 and/or abnormal 24-hour pH values (DeMeester score > 14.7) were considered to have had unsuccessful treatment. Gastroesophageal reflux disease outcomes were compared between groups 1 and 2. Finally, the outcomes of both groups were compared with a control cohort of 418 patients with Nissen fundoplication and no DGE symptoms (group 3). Results: At the mean follow-up of 21 months, there were no differences between the 2 groups regarding relief of reflux symptoms (DGE group, 54 of 63 [85.7%] vs NGE group, 71 of 78 [91%]; P=.47) or objective control of acid reflux (DGE group, 33 of 39 [84.6%] vs NGE group, 41 of 51 [80.3%]; P=.78). Dyspeptic symptoms were improved in the DGE group (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khajanchee, Y. S., Dunst, C. M., & Swanstrom, L. L. (2009). Outcomes of Nissen fundoplication in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and delayed gastric emptying. Archives of Surgery, 144(9), 823–827. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2009.160

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free