The imbalanced training sample problem: under or over sampling?

234Citations
Citations of this article
128Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The problem of imbalanced training sets in supervised pattern recognition methods is receiving growing attention. Imbalanced training sample means that one class is represented by a large number of examples while the other is represented by only a few. It has been observed that this situation, which arises in several practical domains, may produce an important deterioration of the classification accuracy, in particular with patterns belonging to the less represented classes. In this paper we present a study concerning the relative merits of several re-sizing techniques for handling the imbalance issue. We assess also the convenience of combining some of these techniques. © Springer-Verlag 2004.

References Powered by Scopus

SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique

22756Citations
10912Readers
2632Citations
1220Readers
Get full text

The Condensed Nearest Neighbor Rule

1731Citations
452Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

RUSBoost: A hybrid approach to alleviating class imbalance

1523Citations
840Readers
Get full text
642Citations
469Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barandela, R., Valdovinos, R. M., Salvador Sánchez, J., & Ferri, F. J. (2004). The imbalanced training sample problem: under or over sampling? Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 3138, 806–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27868-9_88

Readers over time

‘09‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 55

65%

Researcher 14

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 54

68%

Engineering 19

24%

Mathematics 4

5%

Social Sciences 3

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0