An analysis of the adequacy criteria for evaluating accounts of computation

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this chapter, we explore the possible criteria for evaluating the adequacy of candidate accounts of concrete digital computation. According to proponents of CTM, cognition is computational. Before we can judge the plausibility of any particular CTM, we need to understand what notion of computation this theory employs. Although there are extant accounts of computation, any of which may, in principle, serve as a basis for CTM, it is not clear that they are all equivalent or even adequate as accounts of computation proper. By proposing a plausible alternative to Smith’s adequacy criteria, our goal here is to resist his discouraging claim that noadequate account of computation proper is possible.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fresco, N. (2014). An analysis of the adequacy criteria for evaluating accounts of computation. In Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics (Vol. 12, pp. 33–55). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41375-9_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free