PENGEMBANGAN ALAT UKUR BEBAN KERJA MENTAL PERAWAT DALAM INTERAKSI ASUHAN KEPERAWATAN

Abstract

ABSTRAKKetika melakukan asuhan keperawatan, perawat perlu berinteraksi dengan klien. Interaksi dapatdilaksanakan dengan baik apabila perawatannya mampu beradaptasi dengan beban kerja mentalyang dimanifestasikan ke dalam gejala fi sik, psikologis, dan perilaku yang ditampilkan. Tujuanpenelitian: mengembangkan alat ukur beban kerja mental saat berinteraksi dengan klien dalampemberian asuhan keperawatan. Metode: Penelitian menggunakan metode deskriptif analitis. Alatukur dikembangkan dengan menggunakan pendekatan interpretasi terhadap skala interval danskala ordinal yang diisi oleh 596 partisipan yang diproses melalui sebelas case processing data.Penelitian dilaksanakan di provinsi Jawa Barat, Jawa Tengah, Sumatra Barat, dan Sulawesi Selatan.Validitas dan reliabilitas variabel persepsi Teruji (p=0,996 sebelum interaksi dan p=0,993 setelahinteraksi), observasi (p=0,844 sebelum interaksi, p=0,711) orientasi (p=0,711), identifi kasi (p=0,769),eksplorasi (p=0,773), resolusi (p=0,820), setelah interaksi (p=0,772), angket klien (p=0,64). Hasil:Hasil pengujian model Con fi rmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) melalui program Lisrel menghasilkanp-value=0,150 (p>0,05) dan RMSEA=0,075 (RMSEA<0,1). Diskusi: Diperlukan dukungan regulasisebagai implikasi dalam penggunaan alat ukur. Simpulan: alat ukur ini vaild dan reliabel sebagaiinformasi diagnostik pengukuran beban kerja mental.Kata Kunci: alat ukur, beban kerja mental, interaksi.ABSTRACTNurses in providing nursing care need to interact with clients. Such interaction can be successfullyperformed if the treatment can adapt to mental workload which is manifested into physical,psychological and behavioral symptoms. Objectives: developing a mental workload instrumentwhen interacting with clients in providing nursing care. Methods: It employed a descriptive analyticmethod. The instrument was developed by employing the approach to the interpretation of scaleinterval and ordinal scale which were fi lled by 596 participants and processed through 11 caseprocessing data. The research was conducted in the provinces of West Java, Central Java, WestSumatra and South Sulawesi. Validity and reliability of the perception variables were tested (p=0.996before the interaction and p=0.993 after the interaction), observation (p=0.844 before the interaction,p=0.711), orientation (p=0.711), identifi cation (p=0.769), exploration (p=0.773), resolution (p=0.820),after the interaction (p=0.772), client questionnaire (p=0.64). Results: The results of Con fi rmatoryFactor Analysis (CFA) usingLisrel software indicated p-value=0.150 (p>0.05) and RMSEA=0.075(RMSEA <0.1). Discussion: Regulatory support is needed as an implication for the use of theinstrument. Conclusion: This instrument is valid and reliable to measure mental workload fordiagnostic information.Keywords: instrument, mental workload, interaction.