On the Shoulders of Citers: Notes on the Social Organization of Intellectual Deference

2Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The sociological study of intellectual recognition has tended to focus on highly cited and highly acclaimed authors and perspectives, while reserving some interest for those who are “forgotten.” We know much less about the liminal cases: authors who are in-between fame and oblivion. This paper proposes a way to study intellectual recognition, by examining the liminal case of sociologist Charles H. Cooley. Based on a multilayered (quantitative and qualitative) citation analysis of Cooley’s classic work, Human Nature and the Social Order (HNSO), we study the role of intellectual deference in accounting for this liminality. Specifically, we identify two distinct deference processes: acknowledgment and involvement. We argue that Cooley has survived intellectual oblivion by standing on the shoulders of citers, as he has received substantial acknowledgment but decreasing involvement. In the conclusion, we discuss the implications of our paper for the understanding of the making of sociological theory.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brossard, B., & Ruiz-Junco, N. (2020). On the Shoulders of Citers: Notes on the Social Organization of Intellectual Deference. Sociological Quarterly, 61(3), 567–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2019.1711262

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free