A comparative study of educator backgrounds and their effect on student understanding of the engineering design process and engineering careers, utilizing an underwater robotics program (RTP)

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Numerous studies have demonstrated that educators having degrees in their subject areas significantly enhances student achievement, particularly in secondary mathematics and science (Chaney, 1995; Goe, 2007; Rowan, Chiang, & Miller, 1997; Wenglinsky, 2000). Yet, science teachers in states that adopt the Next Generation Science Standards are facilitating classroom engineering activities despite the fact that few have backgrounds in engineering. This quantitative study analyzed ex-post facto data of 81 educators and 2,455 students who participated in WaterBotics, an innovative underwater robotics program for middle and high school students. This study investigated if educators having backgrounds in engineering (i.e., undergraduate and graduate degrees in engineering) positively affected student learning on two engineering outcomes: 1) the engineering design process, and 2) understanding of careers in engineering (who engineers are and what engineers do). The results indicated that educators having backgrounds in engineering did not significantly affect student understanding of the engineering design process or careers in engineering when compared to educators having backgrounds in science, mathematics, technology education, or other disciplines. There were, however, statistically significant differences between the groups of educators. Students of educators with backgrounds in technology education had the highest mean score on assessments pertaining to the engineering design process while students of educators with disciplines outside of STEM had the highest mean scores on instruments that assess for student understanding of careers in engineering. This might be due to the fact that educators who lack degrees in engineering but who teach engineering do a better job of "sticking to the script" of engineering curricula.

References Powered by Scopus

Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects

803Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Using research on employees' performance to study the effects of teachers on students' achievement

173Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How middle schoolers draw engineers and scientists

166Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The Nexus of Confidence and Gender in an Engineering Project-Based STEM Camp

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scribner, J. A. (2017). A comparative study of educator backgrounds and their effect on student understanding of the engineering design process and engineering careers, utilizing an underwater robotics program (RTP). In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2017-June). American Society for Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--27453

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

50%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 3

60%

Computer Science 1

20%

Mathematics 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free