Barking up the wrong tree: A qualitative study of the potential for dog-owner technology

2Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Current approaches to dog technology are predominantly aimed at owners monitoring and remotely engaging their dogs to prevent boredom when they are left home alone. The potential of technology to enhance the collocated dog-human experience has received little attention. This paper discusses a qualitative study with 10 owners and their dogs, exploring how technology could be used to enhance dog-human interaction in the home. Results highlight that dog toys are actually targeted at play involving both dog and owner; that playful interactions between dogs and owners focus on increasing bonding and affective symbiosis; and that the play isn't the point for neither dog nor human, the relationship is. The study concludes that dog-human technology for collocated enjoyable interaction will be significantly different than that used in remote human-dog interaction and requires further work.

References Powered by Scopus

Animal-computer interaction: A manifesto

239Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Understanding dog-human companionship

187Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The world from a dog's point of view: A review and synthesis of dog cognition research

142Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Examining the Animal-Human Bond through the Lens of Telepresence

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rethinking the Human Centred Approach to Animal-Computer Interaction

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hall, L., McDonald, S., & Young, S. (2018). Barking up the wrong tree: A qualitative study of the potential for dog-owner technology. In Proceedings of the 32nd International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference, HCI 2018. BCS Learning and Development Ltd. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/HCI2018.54

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

60%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

20%

Researcher 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Design 1

25%

Computer Science 1

25%

Engineering 1

25%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free