Low doses of radiation reduce risk in vivo

2Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The "Linear No Threshold" hypothesis, used in all radiation protection practices, assumes that all doses, no matter how low, increase the risk of cancer, birth defects and heritable mutations. In vitro cell based experiments show adaptive processes in response to low doses and dose rates of low LET radiation, and do not support the hypothesis. This talk will present data from animal experiments that test the hypothesis in vivo for all three measurements of radiation risk. The data show that a single, low, whole body dose (less than about 100 mGy) of low LET radiation given at low dose rate, increased cancer latency and consequently reduced both spontaneous and radiation-induced cancer risk in both genetically normal and cancer-prone mice. This adaptive response lasted for the entire lifespan of all the animals that developed these tumors, and effectively restored a portion of the life that would have been lost due to the cancer in the absence of the low dose. In genetically normal fetal mice, prior low doses could also protect against radiation-induced birth defects. In genetically normal adult male mice, a prior low dose protected the mice from induction of heritable mutations produced by a subsequent large dose. Overall, the results demonstrate that the assumption of a linear increase in risk with increasing dose in vivo is not warranted, and that low doses actually reduce risk.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Hormesis: Principles and applications

99Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mitchel, R. E. J. (2004). Low doses of radiation reduce risk in vivo. In Abstracts of the Pacific Basin Nuclear Conference (p. 100). https://doi.org/10.2203/dose-response.06-109.mitchel

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘15‘16‘17‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2401234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

63%

Researcher 6

38%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 6

38%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5

31%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

19%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 11

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0