A comparison between acute pressure block of the sciatic nerve and acupressure: Methodology, analgesia, and mechanism involved

7Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Acupressure is an alternative medicine methodology that originated in ancient China. Treatment effects are achieved by stimulating acupuncture points using acute pressure. Acute pressure block of the sciatic nerve is a newly reported analgesic method based on a current neuroscience concept: stimulation of the peripheral nerves increases the pain threshold. Both methods use pressure as an intervention method. Herein, we compare the methodology and mechanism of these two methods, which exhibit several similarities and differences. Acupressure entails variation in the duration of manipulation, and the analgesic effect achieved can be shortor long-term. The acute effect attained with acupressure presents a scope that is very different from that of the chronic effect attained after long-term treatment. This acute effect appears to have some similarities to that achieved with acute pressure block of the sciatic nerve, both in methodology and mechanism. More evidence is needed to determine whether there is a relationship between the two methods. © 2013 Luo et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Luo, D., Wang, X., & He, J. (2013). A comparison between acute pressure block of the sciatic nerve and acupressure: Methodology, analgesia, and mechanism involved. Journal of Pain Research, 6, 589–593. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S47693

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free