Structure-based vs. task-based syllabus: The effect of type of syllabus on listening comprehension ability of Iranian university students

0Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The present study attempted to investigate the effect of typology of syllabus (structure-based vs. task-based) on the listening comprehension ability of two homogeneous classes (50 participants) during a whole academic semester. The homogeneity was attained through administration of a pre-test taken from Barron's TOEFL (Sharpe, 1996). The selected students were assigned to a structure-based and a task-based group. The subjects in the structure-based group were instructed through American Kernel Lesson: Intermediate (O'Neil et al., 1978), and the second group was instructed through Expanding Tactics for Listening: intermediate (Richards, 2005), representing the structure-based and task-based syllabus, respectively. Unlike the structure-based group, the task-based group demonstrated a considerable and statistically significant improvement in the post-test performance. The results of this study could be of pedagogic significance to syllabus designers, material developers as well as teachers. © 2011 ACADEMY PUBLISHER Manufactured in Finland.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mahmoudi, L., & Amirkhiz, S. Y. Y. (2011). Structure-based vs. task-based syllabus: The effect of type of syllabus on listening comprehension ability of Iranian university students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(10), 1388–1393. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.10.1388-1393

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free