Municipio de Mariana v BHP Group: Implications of the UK High Court's Decision

1Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The High Court of England and Wales in its November 2020 judgment in Municipio de Mariana v BHP Group (BHP) declined jurisdiction to hear the case initiated by victims of the Fundao&tild; Dam collapse in Brazil on the grounds of abuse of process. The decision raises serious questions about the Court's willingness to vindicate the fair trial rights of victims of human rights abuses linked to multinational enterprises (MNEs). In this judgment, Turner J also made obiter comments on the possibility of staying the case on application of Article 34 of the Recast Brussels Regulation (Recast Regulation) the doctrine of forum non conveniens (FNC), and/or the Court's case management discretion. © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Farrington, F. (2021). Municipio de Mariana v BHP Group: Implications of the UK High Court’s Decision. Business and Human Rights Journal, 6(2), 392–398. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2021.10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free