Understanding conative regulation systems - An examination of the differences between offenders and non-offenders

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction Numerous studies confirmed personality traits as being important predictors of criminal behavior. The aim of this research was to determine which constellation of basic personality traits incarcerated individuals and those serving alternative sanctions differ, and which traits make the difference between the criminal and the non-criminal populations. In this research, the model of personality used is a cybernetic model of conative functioning, which assumes that conative regulation systems almost completely describe the structure of personality. Methods The study sample consisted of 391 male respondents (152 offenders serving prison sentence, 91 convicts sentenced to alternative penalties and 148 non-offenders). Examined variables were: The regulator of activity (Extroversion), the regulator of organic functions (Hysteria), the regulator of defense reactions (Anxiety), the regulator of attack reactions (Aggressiveness), the system for coordination of regulatory functions (Psychoticism) and the system for integration of regulatory functions (Integration). Results There were significant differences in all dimensions of personality between groups, except for the framework of Extraversion. The traits that contribute to the difference between individuals serving prison sentence and offenders sentenced to alternative penalties are Integration and Aggressiveness. The traits that contribute to the difference between non-offenders and offenders serving prison sentence are Psychoticism, Integration, Aggressiveness, and Anxiety. Among offenders sentenced to alternative penalties and the general population no difference in personality traits was found. Conclusions Our findings may indicate the need for mandatory diagnostic psychological evaluation of persons who have committed minor offenses, to ensure the right decision is made when choosing between prison and an alternative method of punishment.

References Powered by Scopus

The dark triad and normal personality traits

453Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Structural models of personality and their relation to antisocial behavior: A meta-analytic review

394Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Primary Traits of Eysenck's P-E-N System: Three- and Five-Factor Solutions

210Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Djurdjevic, S., Krivokapic, Z., Shapic, R., & Vicentic, S. (2016). Understanding conative regulation systems - An examination of the differences between offenders and non-offenders. Journal of Special Education and Rehabilitation, 17(1), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.19057/jser.2016.4

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 2

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

25%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 2

50%

Psychology 2

50%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free