Quality indicators in the treatment of patients with depression, bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. Consensus study

10Citations
Citations of this article
90Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Objective: To define a set of indicators for mental health care, monitoring quality assurance in schizophrenia, depression and bipolar disorders in Spain. Material and method: Qualitative research. Consensus-based study involving 6 psychiatrists on the steering committee and a panel of 43 psychiatrists working in several health services in Spain. An initial proposal of 44 indicators for depression, 42 for schizophrenia and 58 for bipolar disorder was elaborated after reviewing the literature. This proposal was analysed by experts using the Delphi technique. The valuation of these indicators in successive rounds allowed those with less degree of consensus to be discarded. Feasibility, sensitivity and clinical relevance were considered. The study was carried out between July 2015 and March 2016. Results: Seventy indicators were defined by consensus: 17 for major depression, 16 for schizophrenia, 17 for bipolar disorder and 20 common to all three pathologies. These indicators included measures related to adequacy, patient safety, exacerbation, mechanical restraint, suicidal behaviour, psychoeducation, adherence, mortality and physical health. Conclusions: This set of indicators allows quality monitoring in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia, depression or bipolar disorder. Mental health care authorities and professionals can use this proposal for developing a balanced scorecard adjusted to their priorities and welfare objectives.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bernardo, M., de Dios, C., Pérez, V., Ignacio, E., Serrano, M., Vieta, E., … Roca, M. (2018). Quality indicators in the treatment of patients with depression, bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. Consensus study. Revista de Psiquiatria y Salud Mental, 11(2), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpsm.2017.09.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free