Background-We recently developed a 4F child catheter that can be inserted into 6F or larger conventional guiding catheters. The use of 4F mother-child technique may improve the delivery of coronary stents to complex lesions. Accordingly, we sought to determine the potential of using a 4F mother-child technique to treat complex coronary lesions. Methods and Results-The support power and the trackability of the mother-child technique of 4-in-6 were evaluated using a coronary artery tree model. In addition, the results of 51 lesions treated by using a 4F child catheter were retrospectively analyzed. The in vitro experiment demonstrated that backup support of the 4-in-6 system was increased when the child catheter was advanced into the coronary tree ≥5 cm (P≤0.01); further, the 4F child catheter was associated with superior trackability as compared with a 5F child catheter (15.0 cm [15.0 to 15.0] versus 13.0 cm [12.8 to 13.0], P<0.005). A total of 51 lesions, in which conventional techniques had been unsuccessful, were treated using the 4F mother-child technique. Lesion success was achieved in 48 (94%) lesions. Stent deployment was attempted in 44 (86%) and was successful in 40 of 44 (91%). There were 2 instances of stent dislodgment. Conclusions-With the superior trackability of the 4F child catheter and with increased backup support of the mother-child system, the 4F mother-child system provided >90% success rate for lesions in which conventional techniques had failed. The 4F mother-child system may become a viable alternative to conventional techniques in treating complex coronary lesions. Copyright © 2011 American Heart Association. All rights reserved.
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
CITATION STYLE
Takeshita, S., Shishido, K., Sugitatsu, K., Okamura, N., Mizuno, S., Yaginuma, K., … Saito, S. (2011). In vitro and human studies of a 4F double-coaxial technique (“mother-child” configuration) to facilitate stent implantation in resistant coronary vessels. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 4(2), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.957290