Cancer risks after radiation exposure in middle age

157Citations
Citations of this article
132Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Epidemiological data show that radiation exposure during childhood is associated with larger cancer risks compared with exposure at older ages. For exposures in adulthood, however, the relative risks of radiation-induced cancer in Japanese atomic bomb survivors generally do not decrease monotonically with increasing age of adult exposure. These observations are inconsistent with most standard models of radiation-induced cancer, which predict that relative risks decrease monotonically with increasing age at exposure, at all ages.MethodsWe analyzed observed cancer risk patterns as a function of age at exposure in Japanese atomic bomb survivors by using a biologically based quantitative model of radiation carcinogenesis that incorporates both radiation induction of premalignant cells (initiation) and radiation-induced promotion of premalignant damage. This approach emphasizes the kinetics of radiation-induced initiation and promotion, and tracks the yields of premalignant cells before, during, shortly after, and long after radiation exposure.ResultsRadiation risks after exposure in younger individuals are dominated by initiation processes, whereas radiation risks after exposure at later ages are more influenced by promotion of preexisting premalignant cells. Thus, the cancer site-dependent balance between initiation and promotion determines the dependence of cancer risk on age at radiation exposure. For example, in terms of radiation induction of premalignant cells, a quantitative measure of the relative contribution of initiation vs promotion is 10-fold larger for breast cancer than for lung cancer. Reflecting this difference, radiation-induced breast cancer risks decrease with age at exposure at all ages, whereas radiation-induced lung cancer risks do not.ConclusionFor radiation exposure in middle age, most radiation-induced cancer risks do not, as often assumed, decrease with increasing age at exposure. This observation suggests that promotional processes in radiation carcinogenesis become increasingly important as the age at exposure increases. Radiation-induced cancer risks after exposure in middle age may be up to twice as high as previously estimated, which could have implications for occupational exposure and radiological imaging. © 2010 The Author.

References Powered by Scopus

Optimization by simulated annealing

34915Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Computed tomography - An increasing source of radiation exposure

7336Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998

1484Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010

725Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Age and cancer risk: A potentially modifiable relationship

558Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Trends in Use of Medical Imaging in US Health Care Systems and in Ontario, Canada, 2000-2016

457Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shuryak, I., Sachs, R. K., & Brenner, D. J. (2010). Cancer risks after radiation exposure in middle age. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 102(21), 1628–1636. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djq346

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 41

55%

Researcher 20

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 13

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 39

56%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12

17%

Physics and Astronomy 11

16%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 8

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 7

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free