The Byzantine Reception of Aristotle’s Parva naturalia (and the Zoological Works) in Eleventh- and Twelfth-Century Byzantium: An Overview

3Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The treatises known as Parva naturalia play quite an important role in Byzantine culture and education. Contrary to what happened in late antiquity, the most important Byzantine commentators devoted great attention to these texts. This probably reflects the Byzantine understanding of Aristotle’s natural philosophy as a reliable account of nature and physiology. More importantly, since there are no late-antique commentaries on the Parva naturalia, the Byzantine commentators were eager to excerpt from all sort of available material that could be helpful for composing an exegesis on these Aristotelian treatises. The way they assembled this material is of greatest interest and justifies a thorough study of the Byzantine commentary tradition.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Trizio, M. (2018). The Byzantine Reception of Aristotle’s Parva naturalia (and the Zoological Works) in Eleventh- and Twelfth-Century Byzantium: An Overview. In Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind (Vol. 17, pp. 155–168). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26904-7_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free