Ischemic and Bleeding Events in PENDULUM Patients with High Bleeding Risk and High Platelet Reactivity

9Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The balance between thrombotic and bleeding risk is of great concern in high bleeding risk (HBR) patients. This study evaluated the relationship between perioperative antiplatelet reactivity and thrombotic and bleeding events in patients at HBR undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods and Results: In this post hoc analysis of the PENDULUM (Platelet rEactivity in patieNts with DrUg eLUting stent and balancing risk of bleeding and ischeMic event) registry, patients undergoing PCI were categorized as HBR or non-HBR, and stratified as having high platelet reactivity (HPR; P2Y12 reaction unit [PRU] >208) or non-HPR (PRU ≤208). Cumulative incidences of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (Journal of the American College of Cardiology expert definitions) and bleeding events (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria) were assessed 12 months after index PCI. The incidence of ischemic and bleeding events was ~3-fold higher in HBR vs. non-HBR patients. Thrombotic/ischemic events were significantly more common in the HPR subgroup in HBR patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11–2.28; P=0.012), but there was no difference in non-HBR patients. After adjustment for covariates, HPR in HBR patients remained an independent factor for thrombotic and ischemic events (HR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.13–2.54; P=0.011), but not for bleeding events (HR: 1.56; 95% CI: 0.78–3.11; P=0.210). Conclusions: Maintaining adequate PRU levels during PCI is an important factor in improving clinical outcomes, especially for HBR patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Iijima, R., Kadota, K., Nakao, K., Nakagawa, Y., Shite, J., Yokoi, H., … Nakamura, M. (2022). Ischemic and Bleeding Events in PENDULUM Patients with High Bleeding Risk and High Platelet Reactivity. Circulation Journal, 86(5), 763–771. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-21-0717

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free