A scoping review on bio-Aerosols in healthcare & the dental environment

233Citations
Citations of this article
385Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Bio-Aerosols originate from different sources and their potentially pathogenic nature may form a hazard to healthcare workers and patients. So far no extensive review on existing evidence regarding bio-Aerosols is available. Objectives This study aimed to review evidence on bio-Aerosols in healthcare and the dental setting. The objectives were 1) What are the sources that generate bio-Aerosols?; 2) What is the microbial load and composition of bio-Aerosols and how were they measured?; and 3) What is the hazard posed by pathogenic micro-organisms transported via the aerosol route of transmission? Methods Systematic scoping review design. Searched in PubMed and EMBASE from inception to 09-03-2016. References were screened and selected based on abstract and full text according to eligibility criteria. Full text articles were assessed for inclusion and summarized. The results are presented in three separate objectives and summarized for an overview of evidence. Results The search yielded 5,823 studies, of which 62 were included. Dental hand pieces were found to generate aerosols in the dental settings. Another 30 sources from human activities, interventions and daily cleaning performances in the hospital also generate aerosols. Fiftyfive bacterial species, 45 fungi genera and ten viruses were identified in a hospital setting and 16 bacterial and 23 fungal species in the dental environment. Patients with certain risk factors had a higher chance to acquire Legionella in hospitals. Such infections can lead to irreversible septic shock and death. Only a few studies found that bio-Aerosol generating procedures resulted in transmission of infectious diseases or allergic reactions.Conclusion Bio-Aerosols are generated via multiple sources such as different interventions, instruments and human activity. Bio-Aerosols compositions reported are heterogeneous in their microbiological composition dependent on the setting and methodology. Legionella species were found to be a bio-Aerosol dependent hazard to elderly and patients with respiratory complaints. But all aerosols can be can be hazardous to both patients and healthcare workers.

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

53614Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews

4590Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Aerosol generating procedures and risk of transmission of acute respiratory infections to healthcare workers: A systematic review

1388Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Possible aerosol transmission of COVID-19 and special precautions in dentistry

372Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

COVID-19 Transmission in Dental Practice: Brief Review of Preventive Measures in Italy

280Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dentists’ awareness, perception, and attitude regarding COVID-19 and infection control: Cross-sectional study among Jordanian dentists

278Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zemouri, C., De Soet, H., Crielaard, W., & Laheij, A. (2017). A scoping review on bio-Aerosols in healthcare & the dental environment. PLoS ONE, 12(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178007

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 105

55%

Professor / Associate Prof. 38

20%

Researcher 27

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 22

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 125

74%

Nursing and Health Professions 16

10%

Engineering 14

8%

Environmental Science 13

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2
References: 4
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 43

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free