Jehovah's Witnesses' refusal of blood: Obedience to scripture and religious conscience

48Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Jehovah's Witnesses are students of the Bible. They refuse transfusions out of obedience to the scriptural directive to abstain and keep from blood. Dr Muramoto disagrees with the Witnesses' religious beliefs in this regard. Despite this basic disagreement over the meaning of Biblical texts, Muramoto flouts the religious basis for the Witnesses' position. His proposed policy change about accepting transfusions in private not only conflicts with the Witnesses' fundamental beliefs but it promotes hypocrisy. In addition, Muramoto's arguments about pressure to conform and coerced disclosure of private information misrepresent the beliefs and practices of Jehovah's Witnesses and ignore the element of individual conscience. In short, Muramoto resorts to distortion and uncorroborated assertions in his effort to portray a matter of religious faith as a matter of medical ethical debate.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ridley, D. T. (1999). Jehovah’s Witnesses’ refusal of blood: Obedience to scripture and religious conscience. Journal of Medical Ethics, 25(6), 469–472. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.25.6.469

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free