Standardized methods for semen evaluation in a multicenter research study

63Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Semen evaluation methodology is complex and difficult to standardize. Rigorously standardized laboratory protocols and strict quality control (QC) are essential for meaningful comparison of data from multiple sites. We describe the methods used for determination of semen volume, sperm concentration, and percent sperm motility in the Study for Future Families, a multicenter study of semen quality in the United States. Each of these 3 semen parameters was assessed using 2 techniques, which provided the opportunity to compare precision and assess suitability for multicenter studies. Detailed protocols were used, and technicians were centrally trained. A total of 509 semen evaluations were performed. Semen volume measured by weight was greater (P < .0001) than that determined by pipetting (3.7 ± 1.6 mL vs 3.2 ± 1.6 mL). Sperm concentration determined using hemacytometer chambers was consistently higher (P .05), although the collapsed values tended to be higher (58.1% vs 51.6%) and less precise (CV 7.7% vs 4.1%) for the categorical method than for motility determined using the simple method. The data obtained in this study demonstrate the critical need for rigorous standardization of protocols and techniques for multicenter studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brazil, C., Swan, S. H., Drobnis, E. Z., Liu, F., Wang, C., Redmon, J. B., & Overstreet, J. W. (2004). Standardized methods for semen evaluation in a multicenter research study. Journal of Andrology, 25(4), 635–644. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2004.tb02835.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free