Academic Libraries Report Minimal Standardization and Oversight of LibGuide Content

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective – To determine what strategies academic libraries use to govern creation and maintenance of their LibGuides. Design – Online survey questionnaire. Setting – A selection of academic libraries that use Springshare’s LibGuide system, mainly in the United States and Canada. Subjects – Academic libraries with administrator level access to LibGuides at 120 large and small, private and public schools. Methods – Researchers made their online questionnaire available on a Springshare lounge and recruited participants through electronic mailing lists. Respondents were self-selected participants. The survey consisted of 35 questions, including several about their institution’s size and type, the number of LibGuides available through their library, and how their guides are created and reviewed. There was space available for comments. The survey stated that the researchers’ goal is to complete an “environmental scan of content strategies” in LibGuides at academic institutions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schroeder, S. B. (2021). Academic Libraries Report Minimal Standardization and Oversight of LibGuide Content. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. University of Alberta. https://doi.org/10.18438/EBLIP29955

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free