Kin of coauthorship in five decades of health science literature

9Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Family background-kinship-can propagate careers. The evidence for academic nepotism is littered with complex associations and disputed causal inferences. Surname clustering, albeit with very careful consideration of surnames' flows across regions and time periods, can be used to reflect family ties. We examined surname patterns in the health science literature, by country, across five decades. Over 21 million papers indexed in the MEDLINE/PubMed database were analyzed. We identified relevant country-specific kinship trends over time and found that authors who are part of a kin tend to occupy central positions in their collaborative networks. Just as kin build potent academic networks with their own resources, societies may do well to provide equivalent support for talented individuals with fewer resources, on the periphery of networks.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Prosperi, M., Buchan, I., Fanti, I., Meloni, S., Palladino, P., & Torvik, V. I. (2016). Kin of coauthorship in five decades of health science literature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(32), 8957–8962. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517745113

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free