Chinese Firms' Acquisition of Innovation Capability from Overseas: Approaches by State- versus Private-Owned Firms

4Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Through two in-depth case studies, we compare the approaches of a state-owned enterprise (SOE), Beijing Automotive Industries Holding Co., and a privately owned enterprise (POE), Geely, to acquire and absorb advanced technological knowledge to enhance their innovation capabilities. Each company acquired advanced knowledge from troubled famous Swedish automakers and upgraded their products technologically. Analyzing data mainly collected from secondary sources identifies major differences in approaches and actions at each acquisition step rooted in the type of ownership. We juxtapose these differences with insights from the literature on knowledge acquisition and research on firm ownership. Our findings show that the POE seeks the strategic goal of synergistic technology integration for better innovation and economic performance. In contrast, the SOE pursues national objectives with less regard for market success. This SOE focuses on an independent approach to knowledge absorption and development during their acquisition, whereas the POE emphasizes collaboration in innovation capacity development. This study provides insights into Chinese firms' positioning on innovation development on the global stage, comparative capitalism, and the particular case of state capitalism in China.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ghorbani, M., Xie, Z., Jin, J., & Wang, F. (2023). Chinese Firms’ Acquisition of Innovation Capability from Overseas: Approaches by State- versus Private-Owned Firms. Management and Organization Review, 19(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2022.26

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free