Near-surface hydrologic response for a steep, unchanneled catchment near Coos Bay, Oregon: 2. Physics-based simulations

67Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The comprehensive physics-based hydrologic-response model InHM was used to simulate 3D variably-saturated flow and solute transport for three controlled sprinkling experiments at the Coos Bay 1 (CB1) experimental catchment in the Oregon Coast Range. The InHM-simulated hydrologic-response was evaluated against observed discharge, pressure head, total head, soil-water content, and deuterium concentration records. Runoff generation, tensiometric/piezometric response in the soil, pore-water pressure generation, and solute (tracer) transport were all simulated well, based on statistical and graphical model performance evaluation. The InHM simulations reported herein indicate that the 3D geometry and hydraulic characteristics of the layered geologic interfaces at CB1 can control the development of saturation and pore-water pressures at the soil-saprolite interface. The weathered bedrock piezometric response and runoff contribution were not simulated well with InHM in this study, most likely as a result of the uncertainty in the weathered bedrock layer geometry and fractured-rock hydraulic properties that preclude accurate fracture flow representation. Sensitivity analyses for the CB1 boundary-value problem indicate that: (i) hysteretic unsaturated flow in the CB1 soil is important for accurate hydrologic-response simulation, (ii) using an impermeable boundary condition to represent layered geologic interfaces leads to large errors in simulated magnitudes of runoff generation and pore-water pressure development, and (iii) field-based retention curve measurements can dramatically improve variably-saturated hydrologic-response simulation at sites with steep soil-water retention curves. The near-surface CB1 simulations reported herein demonstrate that physics-based models like InHM are useful for characterizing detailed spatio-temporal hydrologic-response, developing process-based concepts, and identifying information shortfalls for the next generation of field experiments. The field-based observations and hydrologic-response simulations from CB1 highlight the challenges in characterizing/ simulating fractured bedrock flow at small catchments, which has important consequences for hydrologic response and landslide initiation.

References Powered by Scopus

CLOSED-FORM EQUATION FOR PREDICTING THE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY OF UNSATURATED SOILS.

22259Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I - A discussion of principles

18913Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Developing joint probability distributions of soil water retention characteristics

1860Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: The Primer: Second Edition

514Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An overview of current applications, challenges, and future trends in distributed process-based models in hydrology

397Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Estimating the timing and location of shallow rainfall-induced landslides using a model for transient, unsaturated infiltration

329Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ebel, B. A., Loague, K., Vanderkwaak, J. E., Dietrich, W. E., Montgomery, D. R., Torres, R., & Anderson, S. P. (2007). Near-surface hydrologic response for a steep, unchanneled catchment near Coos Bay, Oregon: 2. Physics-based simulations. American Journal of Science, 307(4), 709–748. https://doi.org/10.2475/04.2007.03

Readers over time

‘09‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

46%

Researcher 12

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 24

62%

Environmental Science 9

23%

Engineering 5

13%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0