For peer review to be successful, students need to submit high-quality reviews of each other’s work. This requires a certain amount of training and guidance by the review system. We consider four methods for improving review quality: calibration, reputation systems, meta-reviewing, and automated meta-reviewing. Calibration is training to help a reviewer match the scores given by the instructor. Reputation systems determine how well each reviewer’s scores track scores assigned by other reviewers. Meta-reviewing means evaluating the quality of a review; this can be done either by a human or by software. Combining these strategies effectively is a topic for future research.
CITATION STYLE
Gehringer, E. F. (2014). A survey of methods for improving review quality. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 8699, pp. 92–97). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13296-9_10
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.