Scaling up task-sharing psychological interventions for refugees in Jordan: A qualitative study on the potential barriers and facilitators

5Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Training nonspecialists in providing evidence-based psychological interventions (i.e. task-sharing) can effectively increase community access to psychological support. However, task-sharing interventions for this purpose are rarely used at scale. The aim of this study was to examine the factors influencing the potential for scaling up (i.e. scalability) of a task-sharing psychological intervention called Problem Management Plus (PM+) for Syrian refugees in Jordan. Semi-structured individual (n = 17) and group interviews (n = 20) were conducted with stakeholders knowledgeable about PM+ and the mental health system for Syrian refugees in Jordan. Using 'system innovation perspective', this study conceptualized the context as landscape developments, and systemic considerations were divided into culture (shared ways of thinking) and structure (ways of organizing). Political momentum was identified as a landscape trend likely facilitating scaling up, while predicted reductions in financial aid was regarded as a constraint. In terms of culture, the medicalized approach to mental health, stigma and gender were reported barriers for scaling up PM+. Using non-stigmatizing language and offering different modalities, childcare options and sessions outside of working hours were suggestions to reduce stigma, accommodate individual preferences and increase the demand for PM+. In relation to structure, the feasibility of scaling up PM+ largely depends on the ability to overcome legal barriers, limitations in human and financial resources and organizational challenges. We recommend sustainable funding to be made available for staff, training, supervision, infrastructure, coordination, expansion and evaluation of 'actual' scaling up of PM+. Future research may examine the local feasibility of various funding, training and supervision models. Lessons learned from actual scaling up of PM+ and similar task-sharing approaches need to be widely shared.

References Powered by Scopus

Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study

4384Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development

1754Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Undertreatment of people with major depressive disorder in 21 countries

685Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Health system responsiveness to the mental health needs of Syrian refugees: mixed-methods rapid appraisals in eight host countries in Europe and the Middle East

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A scoping review of the literature on the application and usefulness of the Problem Management Plus (PM+) intervention around the world

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Implementing a Non-Specialist Delivered Psychological Intervention for Young Adolescents in a Protracted Refugee Setting: a Qualitative Process Evaluation in Lebanon

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Woodward, A., Sondorp, E., Barry, A. S., Dieleman, M. A., Fuhr, D. C., Broerse, J. E. W., … Roberts, B. (2023). Scaling up task-sharing psychological interventions for refugees in Jordan: A qualitative study on the potential barriers and facilitators. Health Policy and Planning, 38(3), 310–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czad003

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

44%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

28%

Researcher 4

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 8

47%

Social Sciences 4

24%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

18%

Arts and Humanities 2

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0