Boundaries matter - The pros and cons of vertical integration in BIM implementation

2Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Boundary spanning systemic innovations such as building information modeling (BIM) are difficult to implement. Literature suggests that vertical integration facilitates the implementation of systemic innovations. This study examines the role of vertical integration in the implementation of BIM as an example of a systemic innovation. It analyzes and compares two opposite case studies from the Finnish construction industry including a vertically integrated and a vertically disintegrated project networks. The findings propose that there are seven structurally relevant factors in BIM implementation; (1) management support, (2) coordination and control, (3) learning and experience, (4) technology management, (5) communication, (6) motivation, and (7) defining roles. Moreover, there are not only advantages but also disadvantages from vertical integration related to each of these implementation factors. Thus, in order to achieve as smooth and successful implementation as possible, managers should understand the impact of the network structure and plan the BIM implementation projects accordingly. © 2012 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lehtinen, T. (2012). Boundaries matter - The pros and cons of vertical integration in BIM implementation. In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (Vol. 384 AICT, pp. 578–585). Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33980-6_62

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free