"quem tem razão, kant ou stendhal?" uma reflexão sobre a crítica de nietzsche à estética de kant

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The present article is a reflection on the way how, in "Genealogy of Morals", Nietzsche rethinks "the aesthetic issue" based on the opposition between Kant's conception of beauty as a predicate of a "disinterested" judgment and the stendhaliana conception of beauty as the effect of a "crystallization" and a "promise of happiness". The key to the thought of Nietzsche's in this context resides on the concept of "intoxication" (Rausch) on the one hand, as a key-term to designate the "pre-physiological condition" of art, but on the other hand, as a process of spiritualisation of the instincts or of the drives, which internalizes and intensifies them. This spiritualization is distinguished from disinterested contemplation for it does not dis-affects us, and because it is by large a spiritualization of sexuality, without renouncing to imply a revaluation of the values and a widening on the horizon of the human. That is why art can be thought of as a "countermovement" that affirms life and fights the "ascetic ideal" and the "European nihilism".

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Constâncio, J. (2013). “quem tem razão, kant ou stendhal?” uma reflexão sobre a crítica de nietzsche à estética de kant. Kriterion (Brazil), 54(128), 475–495. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-512X2013000200012

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free