Randomized Phase II Study of PET Response–Adapted Combined Modality Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: Mature Results of the CALGB 80803 (Alliance) Trial

74Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

PURPOSE To evaluate the use of early assessment of chemotherapy responsiveness by positron emission tomography (PET) imaging to tailor therapy in patients with esophageal and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma. METHODS After baseline PET, patients were randomly assigned to an induction chemotherapy regimen: modified oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil (FOLFOX) or carboplatin-paclitaxel (CP). Repeat PET was performed after induction; change in maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) from baseline was assessed. PET nonresponders (< 35% decrease in SUV) crossed over to the alternative chemotherapy during chemoradiation (50.4 Gy/28 fractions). PET responders (≥ 35% decrease in SUV) continued on the same chemotherapy during chemoradiation. Patients underwent surgery at 6 weeks postchemoradiation. Primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in nonresponders after switching chemotherapy. RESULTS Two hundred forty-one eligible patients received Protocol treatment, of whom 225 had an evaluable repeat PET. The pCR rates for PET nonresponders after induction FOLFOX who crossed over to CP (n = 39) or after induction CP who changed to FOLFOX (n = 50) was 18.0% (95% CI, 7.5 to 33.5) and 20% (95% CI, 10 to 33.7), respectively. The pCR rate in responders who received induction FOLFOX was 40.3% (95% CI, 28.9 to 52.5) and 14.1% (95% CI, 6.6 to 25.0) in responders to CP. With a median follow-up of 5.2 years, median overall survival was 48.8 months (95% CI, 33.2 months to not estimable) for PET responders and 27.4 months (95% CI, 19.4 months to not estimable) for nonresponders. For induction FOLFOX patients who were PET responders, median survival was not reached. CONCLUSION Early response assessment using PET imaging as a biomarker to individualize therapy for patients with esophageal and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma was effective, improving pCR rates in PET nonresponders. PET responders to induction FOLFOX who continued on FOLFOX during chemoradiation achieved a promising 5-year overall survival of 53%.

References Powered by Scopus

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer

4552Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials

3290Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): Long-term results of a randomised controlled trial

2008Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Magnetic resonance linear accelerator technology and adaptive radiation therapy: An overview for clinicians

70Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Improving outcomes in patients with oesophageal cancer

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Advances in diagnosis and management of cancer of the esophagus

33Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goodman, K. A., Ou, F. S., Hall, N. C., Bekaii-Saab, T., Fruth, B., Twohy, E., … Ilson, D. H. (2021). Randomized Phase II Study of PET Response–Adapted Combined Modality Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: Mature Results of the CALGB 80803 (Alliance) Trial. In Journal of Clinical Oncology (Vol. 39, pp. 2803–2815). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.03611

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

67%

Researcher 6

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 21

75%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

11%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

11%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free