Evaluation of molecularly imprinted polymers for the simultaneous SPE of six corticosteroids in milk

12Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A molecularly imprinted solid-phase extraction procedure was optimized for the simultaneous extraction of six corticosteroids commonly employed in animal husbandry. Two different molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) were synthetized by precipitation polymerization, using dexamethasone (DM) and flumethasone (FLU) as template molecules. Methacrylic acid was used as functional monomer and divinylbenzene as cross-linker, and the selected porogen was a solution of acetonitrile and toluene (3:1). After removal of the template, both molecularly imprinted and non-imprinted polymers were placed into glass cartridges to perform solid-phase extraction experiments. Loading, washing and elution steps were optimized for each MIP in order to test the suitability of the selected template molecules DM and FLU to provide selective polymeric sites for corticosteroids. Recovery measurements were performed by HPLC-MS/MS. The maximum recovery for all corticosteroids was achieved with DMbased MIP when loading with toluene and washing with 5% acetonitrile in toluene, and eluting with 1% acetic acid in methanol. When cleaning-up milk samples spiked with corticosteroids, the recovery of DM-based polymer decreased. However, the efficiency of FLU-based polymer clearly improved even when a strong matrix effect was observed. Additionally, two frequently used commercial solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges were compared with imprinted polymers. The commercial SPE cartridges gave good recoveries only for specific analytes while MIPs provided good recoveries for all analyzed corticosteroids. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Díaz-Bao, M., Barreiro, R., Regal, P., Cepeda, A., & Fente, C. (2012). Evaluation of molecularly imprinted polymers for the simultaneous SPE of six corticosteroids in milk. Chromatographia, 75(5–6), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-012-2182-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free