3D segmentation for multi-organs in CT images

15Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The study addresses the challenging problemof automatic segmentation of the human anatomy needed for radiation dose calculations. Three-dimensional extensions of two well-known stateof-the art segmentation techniques are proposed and tested for usefulness on a set of clinical CT images. The new techniques are 3D Statistical Region Merging (3D-SRM) and 3D Efficient Graph-based Segmentation (3D-EGS). Segmentations of eight representative tissues (lungs, stomach, liver, heart, kidneys, spleen, bones and the spinal cord) were tested for accuracy using the Dice index, the Hausdorff distance and the Ht index. The 3D-SRM outperformed 3D-EGS producing the average (across the 8 tissues) Dice index, the Hausdorff distance, and the H2 of 0.89, 12.5 mm and 0.93, respectively.

References Powered by Scopus

Efficient graph-based image segmentation

5442Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparing Images Using the Hausdorff Distance

3709Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Graph-Theoretical Methods for Detecting and Describing Gestalt Clusters

1444Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Computational anatomy for multi-organ analysis in medical imaging: A review

62Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Calibrating level set approach by granular computing in computed tomography abdominal organs segmentation

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

SRM Superpixel Merging Framework for Precise Segmentation of Cervical Nucleus

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bajger, M., Lee, G., & Caon, M. (2013). 3D segmentation for multi-organs in CT images. Electronic Letters on Computer Vision and Image Analysis, 12(2), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/elcvia.516

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

58%

Researcher 6

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 10

45%

Engineering 9

41%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

9%

Arts and Humanities 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free