DAGSVM vs. DAGKNN: An experimental case study with benthic macroinvertebrate dataset

13Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper we examined the suitability of the Directed Acyclic Graph Support Vector Machine (DAGSVM) and Directed Acyclic Graph k-Nearest Neighbour (DAGKNN) method in classification of the benthic macroinvertebrate samples. We divided our 50 species dataset into five ten species groups according to their group sizes. We performed extensive experimental tests with every group, where DAGSVM was tested with seven kernel functions and DAGKNN with four measures. Feature selection was made by the scatter method [8]. Results showed that the quadratic and RBF kernel functions were the best ones and in the case of DAGKNN all measures produced quite similar results. Generally, the DAGSVM gained higher accuracies than DAGKNN, but still DAGKNN is a respectable option in benthic macroinvertebrate classification. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Joutsijoki, H., & Juhola, M. (2012). DAGSVM vs. DAGKNN: An experimental case study with benthic macroinvertebrate dataset. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7376 LNAI, pp. 439–453). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31537-4_35

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free