Abstract versus modality-specific memory representations in processing auditory and visual speech

23Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Serial recall of lip-read, auditory, and audiovisual memory lists with and without a verbal suffix was examined. Recency effects were the same in the three presentation modalities. The disrupting effect of a suffix was largest when it was presented in the same modality as the list items. The results suggest that abstract linguistic as well as modality-specific codes play a role in memory for auditory and visual speech. © 1992 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Gelder, B., & Vroomen, J. (1992). Abstract versus modality-specific memory representations in processing auditory and visual speech. Memory & Cognition, 20(5), 533–538. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199585

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free