Serial recall of lip-read, auditory, and audiovisual memory lists with and without a verbal suffix was examined. Recency effects were the same in the three presentation modalities. The disrupting effect of a suffix was largest when it was presented in the same modality as the list items. The results suggest that abstract linguistic as well as modality-specific codes play a role in memory for auditory and visual speech. © 1992 Psychonomic Society, Inc.
CITATION STYLE
de Gelder, B., & Vroomen, J. (1992). Abstract versus modality-specific memory representations in processing auditory and visual speech. Memory & Cognition, 20(5), 533–538. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199585
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.