The desire to ensure that the benefits of successful small-scale social innovation are more widely available has led to a plethora of frameworks that seek to scale such innovations. We review 20 extant frameworks for scaling and distinguished four directions: up (producing changes in laws, policies, institutions or norms), down (resource allocation to support implementation), in (ensuring organizations have the capacity to deliver the type and number of good practices required) and out (geographically replicating or broadening the range or scope of good practices). In addition to these directions of scaling a generic pathway, or process, to achieve scaling is also discernible across many of the frameworks reviewed. This involves five phases: identifying, planning, implementing, learning and adapting. We stress the need for a more dynamic and systemic approach to scaling, as well as one which anticipates, addresses and assesses the extent to which scaling is inclusive of marginalized groups.
CITATION STYLE
Sánchez Rodríguez, A. M., MacLachlan, M., & Brus, A. (2021). The coordinates of scaling: Facilitating inclusive innovation. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 38(6), 833–850. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2740
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.