Song types as fundamental units in vocal repertoires

40Citations
Citations of this article
99Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We investigated whether song types function as fundamental units of song variation in song sparrows, Melospiza melodia. As the size of a male song sparrow's repertoire increases, so does the mean similarity of his song types, as measured by the sharing of minimal units of production (MUPs). It follow that if MUP similarity is important perceptually, then small repertoires (of dissimilar song types) may be functionally equivalent to large repertoires (of similar song types). We performed two experiments to test whether MUP similarity is important perceptually to male song sparrows. Both experiments used a habituation/recovery design, in which recovery in response at a switch in stimuli is used to gauge the subject's perception of the similarity of the stimuli. The results of both experiments indicate that the level of perceived similarity between pairs of songs does not depend on their level of MUP similarity, within the range of MUP similarities found between song types. Songs with high enough MUP similarity to be judged as variants of the same song type are, however, perceived to be much more similar than are any two song types. The results are compatible with a categorical model of song type perception.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Searcy, W. A., Nowicki, S., & Peters, S. (1999). Song types as fundamental units in vocal repertoires. Animal Behaviour, 58(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1128

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free