Training dual-task walking in community-dwelling adults within 1 year of stroke: a protocol for a single-blind randomized controlled trial

36Citations
Citations of this article
372Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Community ambulation is a highly complex skill requiring the ability to adapt to increased environmental complexity and perform multiple tasks simultaneously. After stroke, individuals demonstrate a diminished ability to perform dual-tasks. Current evidence suggests that conventional rehabilitation does not adequately address gait-related dual-task impairments after stroke, which may be contributing to low levels of participation and physical inactivity in community-dwelling stroke survivors. The objective of this study is to investigate the efficacy of dual-task gait training in community-dwelling adults within 1 year of stroke. Specifically, we will compare the effects of dual-task gait training and single-task gait training on cognitive-motor interference during walking at preferred speed and at fastest comfortable speed (Aim 1), locomotor control during obstacle negotiation (Aim 2), and spontaneous physical activity (Aim 3).Methods/Design: This single-blind randomized controlled trial will involve 44 individuals within 12 months of stroke. Following baseline evaluation, participants will be randomly allocated to single- or dual-task gait training. Both groups will receive 12, 30-minute sessions provided one-on-one over 4-6 weeks in an outpatient therapy setting. Single-task gait training involves practice of gait activities incorporating motor relearning principles. Dual-task gait training involves an identical gait training protocol; the critical difference being that the dual-task gait training group will practice the gait activities while simultaneously performing a cognitive task for 75% of the repetitions. Blinded assessors will measure outcomes at baseline, post-intervention, and 6 months after completion of the intervention. The primary outcome measure will be dual-task effects on gait speed and cognition during unobstructed walking. Secondary outcomes include spatiotemporal and kinetic gait parameters during unobstructed single- and dual-task walking at preferred and fastest comfortable walking speeds, gait parameters during high and low obstacle crossing, spontaneous physical activity, executive function, lower extremity motor function, Timed Up and Go, balance self-efficacy, number of falls, and stroke-related disability. Hypotheses for each aim will be tested using an intention-to-treat analysis with repeated measures ANOVA design.Discussion: This trial will provide evidence to help clinicians make decisions about the types of activities to include in rehabilitation to improve dual-task walking after stroke.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01568957. © 2012 Plummer-D'Amato et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment

17960Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons

10984Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: A clinical examination scale

4675Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Measuring treatment effects on dual-task performance: A framework for research and clinical practice

274Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Physical fitness training for stroke patients

120Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Walking Adaptability after a Stroke and Its Assessment in Clinical Settings

113Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Plummer-D’Amato, P., Kyvelidou, A., Sternad, D., Najafi, B., Villalobos, R. M., & Zurakowski, D. (2012). Training dual-task walking in community-dwelling adults within 1 year of stroke: a protocol for a single-blind randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurology, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-12-129

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25020406080

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 126

64%

Researcher 37

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 26

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 8

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 74

42%

Nursing and Health Professions 44

25%

Psychology 32

18%

Neuroscience 27

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0