As the most important studies in the field have pointed out (see, for example, Bourdieu, 1965; Sontag, 1978; Chalfen, 1987; Odin, 1995; Zimmermann, 1995; Moran, 2002; Cati, 2009), the practice of home movie making has always been linked to technical and technological change. Indeed, the evolution of family video equipment, from Super 8 to digital, has allowed individuals to express themselves according to their social and cultural status. I reject the position that the symbolic effects of family images are connected consequentially to the technologies employed to realise them. However, I think that the material dimension of home movies cannot be neglected, because it is this that ultimately provides so much satisfaction to people wishing to pass on their memories.
CITATION STYLE
Sapio, G. (2014). Homesick for Aged Home Movies: Why Do We Shoot Contemporary Family Videos in Old-Fashioned Ways? In Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies (pp. 39–50). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137375889_3
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.