Recent public policy debate has focused concern on the equity di- mensions of categorical discrimination based on sex, age, or race in insurance and similar markets. We consider the efficiency effects of such discrimination and establish that costless imperfect categoriza- tion always enhances efficiency. When categorization entails a non- negligible resource cost, however, no unambiguous efficiency rank- ing of informational regimes is possible. When categorization is costless, we demonstrate that government, having no better informa- tion than market participants, can effect redistribution without as- suming dictatorial control of the market, implying that a market equilibrium with costless categorization is potentially Pareto superior to one without it. When categorization is costly, however, the market may categorize when Pareto improvements are not possible.
CITATION STYLE
Crocker, K. J., & Snow, A. (1986). The Efficiency Effects of Categorical Discrimination in the Insurance Industry (pp. 444–467). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7957-5_23
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.