Development of intimal hyperplasia in six different vascular prostheses

58Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare six vascular prostheses for the development of intimal hyperplasia (IH) in a sheep model. Material and methods: Prostheses tested were gelatin sealed Dacron (GSD), fluoropassivated Dacron (FPD), Fluropassiv(TM) (FD), expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), carbon-lined expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (CL-ePTFE) and vascular access graft (VAG). Sixty-two adult female Merino sheep (35-45kg) were used. Elliptical graft patches were implanted into the left common carotid artery using one of the six graft types: GSD (n=10), FPD (n=10), FD (n=12) VAG (n=10), ePTFE (n=10), or CL-ePTFE (n=10). Four weeks later grafts were removed for histopathological assessment and measurement of the degree of IH obtained on a computerised image analysis system. Results: IH indices were significantly less for FPD (0.191±0.095, p<0.05), FD (0.199±0.081, p<0.05), ePTFE (0.213±0.078, p<0.05) and CL-ePTFE (0.161±0.066, p<0.01), compared to the GSD group (0.287±0.077). The VAG group (0.257±0.091) showed no difference compared to GSD. There was no significant difference between the FPD, FD, ePTFE and CL-ePTFE grafts. Conclusion: This study indicates that less IH occurred in the two-ePTFE grafts and two fluoropolymer coated Dacron grafts than in gelatin sealed Dacron or polyurethane grafts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ao, P., Hawthorne, W., Vicaretti, M., & Fletcher, J. (2000). Development of intimal hyperplasia in six different vascular prostheses. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 20(3), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.2000.1177

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free