Assessment techniques and students' higher-order thinking skills

5Citations
Citations of this article
697Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Improving students' higher-order thinking skills is higher-order thinking skills is a collective experience; one teacher of a specific subject cannot alone improve the higher-order thinking skills, and it is a collaborative process between all subjects' teachers and can be taught for all levels of studying. Moreover, these skills can be developed in a cumulative fashion as students' progress through their courses and subjects and other experiences they get from their institutions. As well, by including their subjects by problem solving, critical thinking and decision making activities will help students enhance their higher-order thinking skills. In this paper a mathematics test in fractions was constructed and analyzed for both grades 8 and 9 to make sure how teacher-made tests are constructed and how much of them agreed with the Bloom's Taxonomy levels. Results showed that most of teacher-made tests measure the lower levels in Bloom's taxonomy. Moreover, 57.14% of the test items are applications and 28.57% are recognition items. Moreover, many studies indicated that 87% of the teachers' items that have participated in this study used level 1 of the taxonomy. These numbers reflect the tendency of the assessment methods used in schools to ask students to recall information or to do routine questions.

References Powered by Scopus

1289Citations
1260Readers
Get full text
835Citations
563Readers
Get full text

Academic Work

783Citations
237Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abosalem, Y. (2015). Assessment techniques and students’ higher-order thinking skills. In ICSIT 2018 - 9th International Conference on Society and Information Technologies, Proceedings (pp. 61–66). International Institute of Informatics and Systemics, IIIS. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20160401.11

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2503570105140

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 151

59%

Lecturer / Post doc 88

34%

Researcher 11

4%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 84

44%

Mathematics 51

27%

Linguistics 30

16%

Arts and Humanities 27

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0