Mobile ambulatory application asafny and traditional phone request 997: A comparative cross-sectional study

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to determine whether there was a time difference between the ambulatory application Asafny and traditional type 997 in reaching people in need and interacting appropriately. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted using retrospective cross-sectional study. A total of 2120 ambulance requests was extracted from Saudi Red Crescent Authority servers in Eastern Province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The requests were extracted between 2017 and 2019. Results: There were no significant differences between the two methods of request. In 2019, the shortest times for all phases of requests were recorded. “Ordinary patient” was the most common cause for requests. Conclusion: Over the years, efforts by the Saudi Red Crescent Authority facilitated improvements in ambulatory services by adapting new technology and services. This has helped reduce times for all phases of emergency requests.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Althumairi, A., Alnasser, Z., Alsadeq, S., Al-Kahtani, N., & Aljaffary, A. (2020). Mobile ambulatory application asafny and traditional phone request 997: A comparative cross-sectional study. Open Access Emergency Medicine, 12, 471–480. https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S279969

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free